Skip to content

Search the reference

Scientific profiles are awaiting evidence review.

Total Fluorine Measurements in Food Packaging: How Do Current Methods Perform?

Quoted values stay tied to the cited study. Empty sections are gaps.

Summary

Key numbers

Source-reported values checked against the cited page of the filed PDF. Values are reported as printed, without conversion. These are selected records, not an exhaustive transcription.

analytevalueunitbasissource locationlimits and qualifiers
PFOA4.32pg/cm²FF2; targeted PFAS analysisPDF p.4, section 3.2.1EOF MDL 0.04-0.07 µg/cm² (PDF p.4). Instrument-specific fluorine limits are not interchangeable with individual PFAS limits.
PFOA22.4pg/cm²MP5; targeted PFAS analysisPDF p.4, section 3.2.1EOF MDL 0.04-0.07 µg/cm² (PDF p.4). Instrument-specific fluorine limits are not interchangeable with individual PFAS limits.

1 further transcribed values remain under review and are not shown.

Evidence Fitness

primary_measurement. Method comparison includes measured packaging. Surface-sensitive PIGE and bulk methods differ for thick paperboard. The sum of targeted PFAS is not EOF.

Methods (brief)

CIC, PIGE and instrumental neutron activation for TF; CIC EOF and UHPLC-MS/MS target analysis (PDF pp.2-4).

Analytes or measurement scopes: TF, EOF, PFOA, PFHxA, PFAS precursors. Target identities are not inferred from the manifest acronym scan.

Limitations

EOF MDL 0.04-0.07 µg/cm² (PDF p.4). Instrument-specific fluorine limits are not interchangeable with individual PFAS limits.

Selected rows are a bounded extraction, not a complete transcription of every table. Supplied main articles are the evidence boundary; unstaged supplements were not retrieved. Aggregate fluorine, targeted PFAS, migration, material content, detection frequency and modeled exposure remain distinct. All findings remain HOLD pending Elon verification.

Provenance notes

Citation: Lara Schultes; Graham F. Peaslee; John D. Brockman; Ashabari Majumdar; Sean R. McGuinness; John T. Wilkinson; Oskar Sandblom; Ruth A. Ngwenyama; Jonathan P. Benskin (2019). Total Fluorine Measurements in Food Packaging: How Do Current Methods Perform?. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. Bibliographic identity checked against the deposited title page. Manifest DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00700. Printed DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00700.

Local input: schultes-2019-total-fluorine-measurements-in-food-packaging.pdf. SHA256: a76054655044f8078412e0c836378054ab813ea11de9398da2c3b460f588c62f. Byte-identical PDF copy: raw/fci-ingest-1/food-packaging-paperboard-cartons/schultes-2019-total-fluorine-measurements-in-food-packaging.pdf. Access and license text from the manifest are preserved in the raw intake control, without claiming independent external verification. No external retrieval was performed.

See reports/fci-ingest-1/food-packaging-paperboard-cartons/MISMATCHES.csv for unresolved source conflicts. Public findings are intentionally empty; held_findings and this table are private review evidence.

Wiki pages updated on ingest

Paperboard cartons

PFHxA

PFOA

Total organic fluorine